The attract of modifying is the chance it gives to be on the heart of the connection between the author and the viewers.

Modifying teaches me to grasp the author’s thoughts — how they suppose, how they write, what they know, and the way a lot of that interprets to their pc display. Having written and edited for the SaaS tech trade prior to now, I can say that, to some extent, I perceive writing; to some extent, I’m additionally the viewers.

The guts of an editor’s function is putting a steadiness between the creator’s ideas and what the target market needs to learn whereas making certain writing high quality. It’s also essential to contribute to staff objectives and meet our service degree settlement (SLA)

To ensure high quality and meet deadlines, it is important to arrange environment friendly processes. Ask any editor, and so they’ll probably say an article isn’t actually “completed” — it is the deadline that decides its destiny.

When AI turned all of the hype, with the promise of effectivity, I couldn’t cease fascinated about its potential for editors. The character of a brand new know-how is frightening at first, however that’s what I considered Fb (umm…Meta?) so a few years again, and look the place that’s now. So, I made a decision to provide AI-assisted modifying a go.

I may say the remaining is historical past, however then I’d be mendacity to you. But it surely does have a whole lot of promise, and I don’t say that on a whim however after rounds of experimentation attempting to include AI into modifying processes at G2. 

And to reply the largest query ever – will AI steal my job? Let’s discover out. 

The promise of AI to remodel content material modifying workflows

I handle the modifying staff at G2. On a standard day, my staff of world editors works on and publishes quite a lot of articles written by in-house writers, freelancers, and exterior thought leaders. Effectivity-wise, the percentages have been by no means in our favor, however we’re a powerful, gifted staff, so we persevered.

When ChatGPT turned everybody’s new favourite content material creator, G2 launched a program to do “ten % extra” with AI — an initiative to make use of AI to enhance day by day productiveness. This motivated me to problem the staff and discover whether or not we may use AI to resolve our underlying issues of assembly our effectivity objectives.

Organising our check run

My expectation at that time was to make use of AI to provide a while again to my staff so they might begin fascinated about the author’s voice and viewers wants and never simply run by way of copy edits and customary line edits to suit our model voice.

To this finish, we began by establishing a check run.

Experiment spherical 1

No agenda-driven experiment can run properly and not using a methodology in place. With the above effectivity challenges in thoughts, we arrange the framework for our first spherical of experiments.

Each editor on the staff was assigned a selected AI instrument and some articles from the modifying pipeline. The ask was for them to edit these articles with the AI instrument and doc their learnings. 

The method was subjective. It was as much as the editors how they wished to make use of the AI instrument and for what use instances.

Their solely goal was to reply a questionnaire and assist their solutions with screenshots of the instrument, in addition to their perspective or understanding of the way it went. 

Right here’s what the questionnaire seemed like:

round 1 questionnaire

So, what did we study within the first spherical?

The nice:

  • AI helped enhance the structural stream and logical development of content material, successfully contextualizing scattered concepts.
  • It proved adept at filling content material gaps and increasing on current content material, figuring out probably missed concepts that may very well be integrated into the article, and serving as an excellent supply of inspiration for framing sentences or if you end up caught creatively.
  • AI was useful in bettering grammar and spelling accuracy.
  • AI has the potential to avoid wasting time throughout the content material modifying course of, but it surely depends upon the kind and complexity of the content material piece.
  • AI-generated compelling, various title choices and refined headlines.
  • AI successfully edited content material to match particular model tips or editorial requirements.

The unhealthy:

  • AI typically misunderstands the context, resulting in incorrect recommendations.
  • There have been cases the place the AI-generated content material was robotic or unnatural.
  • Integrating AI into current workflows could also be difficult. 
  • Reviewing and verifying adjustments made by the AI instrument is time-consuming.
  • AI is just not well-suited for contextual modifying or long-form articles.
  • AI appears higher fitted to writers than editors.
  • At instances, AI made pointless adjustments to the context or broken the originality of the writing.
  • Even after inputting a selected immediate, AI might rewrite the article as a substitute of adjusting grammar or sentence construction.
  • Sure modifying duties appear past the present capabilities of AI.

Sure, these are blended outcomes! 

Whereas one editor mentioned the AI instrument helped construct context gaps, one other staff member mentioned it was unsuited for contextual modifying.

However all in all, the outcomes have been undoubtedly higher than we anticipated.

Experiment spherical 2

For our second spherical, we moved from a subjective to a extra goal course of. 

Editors have been instructed to make use of AI in each step of the modifying course of — from the primary spherical of favor edits to developmental modifying to ultimate proofreading. And whereas they did so, they have been required to notice the time it took them to finish the modifying spherical. 

Right here’s an instance of what it seemed like:

notes round 2notes round 2

We adopted the identical method for analyzing the AI instrument’s work. This included prompts associated to bettering article introductions, suggesting adjustments to condemn construction, and proofreading.

What did we study within the second spherical?

In comparison with spherical 1, this spherical gave us extra promising outcomes, main us to conclude that AI may assist us in additional methods than one.

However there was nonetheless an extended strategy to go.

Establishing use instances

After two rounds of experimentation with two completely different methodologies, we now had a reasonably strong thought of what AI may and couldn’t do. Regardless of limitations, it was turning into more and more clear to me that AI may very well be the messiah of our effectivity challenges.

This meant that it was time to delve deeper and conduct at the very least one other spherical of experimentation. However this time, we wanted a extra acute construction to our methodology with a view to determine AI’s particular use instances in modifying.

Experiment spherical 3

The third spherical consisted of making a template with a immediate for every use case, which can be utilized in each sub-step of the modifying course of. Every immediate we used on this stage was tried and examined throughout the first two rounds of experimentation to offer the specified outcomes.

The template was additionally accompanied by a set of tips for the editors, which have been knowledgeable by our learnings. The rules included which AI instrument to make use of for sure use instances. For instance, whereas Google’s Gemini may very well be used to search out contextual gaps, ChatGPT could be useful to ideate higher article introductions. This documentation would function a singular set of tips (or supply of fact) for the staff.

As soon as the template was prepared, the editors reviewed and ran the prompts with the instructed AI instrument. The ultimate step was to share their ideas on the above as a staff and resolve any roadblocks.

Listed below are some examples of what it seemed like:

template round 3

template round 3

The editors may now simply copy-paste the usual set of prompts into the AI instrument and measure effectivity features or losses.

Second of fact: experiment outcomes

Now it’s time for the large reveal.

On common, modifying a medium-complexity, 2,000-word article about software program opinions took editors 25.25 minutes with the assistance of AI.


With guide modifying, the modifying course of would, on common, take one hour to edit.

Nevertheless, you will need to acknowledge that an effectivity achieve to this extent is just not attainable after one or two iterations. It might additionally not be true for all instances. We’ve had a number of cases the place an editor spent extra time with AI than they might with guide modifying.

However for now, let’s rejoice this win.

Key takeaways

AI does an ideal job of in search of gaps in writing. However it might, each infrequently, determine a niche that isn’t there. As a rule, AI will change the voice of the author, making a human’s voice sound like robots from Skynet days. AI will nearly undoubtedly begin your articles with “Within the ever-evolving enterprise panorama” or worse, flip phrases like “worker happiness” into “laborer’s prosperity.”

The trick is to search out what works for you. We discovered our greatest prompts after working by way of a number of unhealthy ones. The most effective use case of AI is what you may make.

My ultimate verdict on utilizing AI in modifying is that it does resolve our effectivity challenges. However it might not all the time give us the perfect path ahead. Editors want to make use of their finest judgment always. 

It does, nonetheless, develop into the instrument that we didn’t know we wanted. 

With AI, we are able to now confidently meet a strict deadline and cling to our SLA. AI additionally helps us get “unstuck” sooner. Whereas modifying, we’re typically caught pondering if there are gaps within the article we didn’t discover or if there are higher methods to construction a sentence.

AI helps pace up ideation and, therefore, improves effectivity.

Based mostly on our learnings, the next AI content material information highlights the one use instances the place we discovered AI useful with modifying. However keep in mind that it depends upon the kind and complexity of the article.

Obtain your AI content material modifying information!

So, will AI steal my job?

Quick reply: not but. AI doesn’t have a persona but.

Whereas AI might excel in grammar checks and filling structural gaps, it doesn’t have unique ideas, and that’s the sting, the perfect, and the largest factor we, as people, convey to the desk.

AI can not change the human component of with the ability to determine context, nuance, sarcasm, voice, and intent.

“The content material creation sport is altering quick. As editors, we juggle deadlines with the necessity for polished, constant items. However what if there was a strategy to streamline the modifying course of with out sacrificing our human contact? That is the place AI assistants like ChatGPT and Gemini are available in – they don’t seem to be right here to steal our jobs; they’re right here to make us even higher storytellers.


These tireless instruments can deal with all of the grunt work, like grammar checks, fact-finding, and repetitive edits. This frees us seasoned editors to deal with the actual magic — crafting compelling narratives, making certain the message resonates with readers, and preserving the author’s voice. The consequence? Content material that is not simply correct however fascinating.


AI is a robust instrument to spice up our effectivity and polish our work, however the human contact is irreplaceable. So, let’s embrace this modifying revolution, one completely edited sentence at a time.”

– Jigmee Bhutia, Senior Content material Editor, G2

The nice, the unhealthy, and the ugly of AI-assisted modifying

After I first requested my staff about engaged on an AI experiment, I began questioning if I’d make AI necessary or non-compulsory to make use of if the experiment was profitable. Now that I’m right here and we’re profitable, I’ve chosen to maintain it non-compulsory. In artistic processes, freedom is important. 

Whereas we found the worth AI brings, integrating it into current workflows was not with out challenges.

There’s a enormous studying curve with any new know-how. Each editor has their very own distinctive model of modifying. Incorporating a instrument into that workflow means disrupting their creativity. So it takes a while to get used to this alteration. However as soon as your experiments bear fruit, it’s troublesome to return to thoroughly conventional modifying processes. 

Greater than that, what is required is perseverance.

It isn’t a simple job to maintain going at it even after rounds of experiments fail. Utilizing AI as a instrument to boost and never change their current expertise and the will to do ten % extra, modifying groups may undoubtedly discover a win with AI on the finish of all of it.

In search of extra information about how AI is altering the world of content material? Be taught extra about the way forward for AI in writing.

You May Also Like

More From Author

+ There are no comments

Add yours